We were hardly a hundred words into Jonathan Franzen’s essay in the New Yorker about climate change and conservation when we suddenly found 福利姬视频 taking all kinds of flak about our concern about the impacts of climate change on birds, of all things. As though doing research on the topic and taking steps to do something about it might somehow be bad for birds. By the time we got to the end, our confusion had turned to incredulity. Just what exactly was this man trying to say? Franzen’s flawed logic leads him to believe that people can’t work to reduce the sources of climate pollution while protecting the birds and places they love at the same time. That’s not our experience here at 福利姬视频—far from it. Our members can walk and chew gum at the same time. To make his point, Franzen incorrectly interprets the words of a Minnesota newspaper blogger Jim Williams. Franzen misquotes Williams as saying that if global warming is such a threat to birds, why should...